Recently I wrote on the topic of being a leader or a manager
Click link here to read: Are You A Leader Or A Manager?
Today I wanted to expound on this topic.
Just because we are modeled after the military doesn’t mean we are now equipped to bark orders.
If we look hard at our mission and the purpose for which we were created, we would recognize that our mission is about grace and love to those we can reach. I wonder sometimes if we forget our purpose from time to time. Sometimes when power and authority is given to a person it can taint that person, make them “too big for their britches” (as my Grandmother used to say). Power and authority, if not handled correctly, can cause more harm than good. An added measure of humility is needed, as well as the constant reminder that the Holy Spirit is really who is in charge…and drives us to do the mighty work that we do.
Let me dissect this issue this morning, and I’m not saying this happens all the time, but it does happen from time to time in our Army and we need to be aware of it!
Leading through Fear:
When a leader (Local Officer, Corps Officer, Divisional Officer, Territorial Officer) leads through fear and intimidation a few things take place – sure, the “fear of God” is put into those they “Command”, but so does resentment, reluctance in making any further decisions, and innovative/creative thinking takes a back seat. This goes back to being a manger instead of a leader. A manager has the tendency to micromanage everything and does not allow those who work under them to claim part of the ownership within the mission. When the micromanaging takes place the workers or those subordinate to the manager feel as if the manager is lurking over their shoulder all the time and will pull back from being proactive for fear of not adhering to the manager’s vision. You see when leading through fear, generally it’s not about a shared vision, it is about perceived forced vision that only one can manage and the rest must fall in line. This is not a consultative democracy by any means, rather this model represents a fearful authoritative model of management.
Leading through fear might garner results, but it also suffocates ingenuity, creative planning and incorporating others into the vision. As an Army, many of us have witnessed this type of leadership whether at the corps level, at the divisional level or beyond. Sure, perceived strength in that “leader” might occur, but a stronger model brings others along to accomplish the mission not by wrangling, forcing and demanding.
Leading through Grace:
I recall one such leader in my life.
He was giving me feedback on my performance, and in the midst of his honest and candid critique he actually wept when praying for my wife and me. It was touching, it was genuine…it wasn’t business as usual, this leader actually cared for us and wanted us to become the best leaders we could possibly be. Was this leader a “pushover”? No way! He could be firm when he needed to be, but many times his leadership exuded a godly example of grace and love for those he led.
Leading through grace doesn’t mean subordinates can do whatever they want and there is little to no accountability, rather this type of leadership (not management) provides kind and loving direction so that not only the mission can be completed but a shared vision can be cultivated.
It is weakness not strength that dictates to managers that they must exert their authority and “put the fear of God” into a subordinate.
It is weakness not strength that commands respect, when respect is earned by working alongside one another.
It is weakness not strength that requires telling people what to do over consulting them and finding the solution to issues together in order to accomplish the same holy mission.
Let me say something controversial here for a moment –
The Salvation Army needs fewer managers who lead through fear and intimidation and more leaders who will lead by example and lead through grace! Perhaps that isn’t so controversial at all…perhaps this is already happening. I believe that the time of fear mongering “leadership” within our Army is at an end. I believe that if we are to better our Army, more grace must be exercised. More love exuded. More honesty and ownership of the mission. We cannot rely on some of our failed models of leadership to usher us into the present and future.
Some might think this is completely and totally directed and executive leadership, but I beg to differ. This is directed at anyone and everyone who might pick up a mantle of leadership from the local officer level all the way up to the office of General. How we choose to lead makes a HUGE difference!
So what will it be?
Leadership built on Fear or Leadership built on Grace?
Grace still has accountability.
Grace still has difficult conversations.
Grace still commands respect (more so than fear ever did).
I hope we all aspire to be the kinds of leaders that exude grace and love…let’s put down the iron fist.
Something more for our Army world to ponder today.
To God be the glory!
Well said. I believe that the real change that affects the way we lead occurs when we truly begin to give ourselves completely to Jesus. That love pushes us to strive to image Him, and all of the Christlike characteristics you mention. Grace, mercy, love, accountability, passion for His people all become the way we interact with others, no matter where they are “positioned” in our “hierarchy”. Keeping pondering my friend!
It’s lonely at the top.